THE HUMAN BEING AS THE NATURE.

• Do you know anything about the world around you? ask Don Huan his student Carlos Castanaeda in their second meeting.
• I know all possible reply Castanaeda and thinking of their academic education.
• I mean, do you ever the world around you? ask Huan.
• I feel so much of the world around me as I can, Carlos responds.
• It is not enough. You have to feel it all over, or the meaning of the world lost reply Huan.

Carlos Catanaeda: Don Huan's Teachings.

The dialectic between the device to understand in the meaning of to explore, unveil and acknowledge the world's interdependent relationships, at the same time as one can feel the entirety of itself in the world and the entirety of the world itself, is the very foundation for living in it, with it and for it, at the same time that it lives in the us, with us and for all of us.

All natural laws, all the laws that we discover tell us just what that under certain circumstances is possible, and what is under the same tedious-States is impossible. The laws say at least about what is really going on and about what will happen, they specify only what might happen. The laws of nature is a collection of probability tables

Thus, the human being framtro in the first place as a result of deposits or an accumulation of possibilities that favored precisely the emergence of the human being as a State of existence the possibility in nature. This was only possible because the possibilities fakstisk existed in reality. The human being appeared — first as an opportunity because this opportunity in fact existed with the necessity in the possible.

If the human being is nature and the human being is a confession being, so we can look at the human being as one of nature's possibilities of self-knowledge. This does not mean that the nature of necessity had to bring forth the human being, but that the man appeared as a coincidence in the nødvendighetens stream, where it fully complies with the by nature is the development towards increasingly complex forms and State of existence where the man can be seen as one of several possible forms State of existence.

Out from the human capacity to cognition, i.e., to bring their actions and thoughts in accordance with the basic laws in and outside of their own existence, is included with the necessity that the nature also has the possibility of producing a negation (counterpoint) of cognition, a quest to cancel, negate sit outside and over the nature's logic, destruction, a devastating run counter to the realization. This could result in the extinction of the erkjennede part of the nature, including also the things we have given the name the human being.

If the person's nature, so that the General also treading upon the human being forward in its physical appearance, it has a brain, is of flesh and blood, have two legs, two arms and a sensory device. The General by mennsket is dialectical, the physical appeal gives rise to state of existence the possibility, at the same time as this realization possibility seems back on the physical appearance.

In this connection, these humans are common are the same. But also in the generic man treading the distinctive forward. Precisely in the similarity lies the difference, just that that all people are equally ensures their inequality. Diversity, the diversity of the human being is the very foundation of the like. Through the realization of the connection, we attach the basis for true inequality that is rooted in a deep realization of togetherness.

If the human being is nature also follows that men and women are equal, even if they are as different as two men, two women, or adults and children. In our diversity projects the unit forward and makes all human beings to each other's condition. Then it is not freedom, equality, equality etc. anything that women need to recap, it's something that needs to be recovered by us all.

Through the realization of the connection, we add the prerequisites for true inequality, and through the true inequality can man be reconciled in a dialectical unity, in which the distinctive and that the General melting sanmen. This together-smeltningen Knight looked over in a new quality, a virklighetens love nest, in which all the people are United in one, one both unite and be distinguished from all others. It is this which can be called true individuality.

If the human being is the peculiar form of nature's pursuit of self-knowledge manifests itself through, so then it must be the General in the peculiar is that this distinctive form, the human being, has the public State of existence the possibility.

If the person's nature, we can consider the following theses:

• All natural laws apply without exception also for the mennskelige organism.
• All human activity is an expression of nature's movement, change and transformation.
• Inner konekvens, deep relationships on the complex plan is the core of all natural laws.
• This is true of any relationship between people as it relates to the internal processes of the human being including the cognitive processes.All visitation is interacting with nature.
• All the movement, change and transformation projects out of the, at the same time laying the Foundation for and maintains a pervasive internal consistency.
• All human activity is a search for inner correlations that are based on nature's consistent harmony, even in the most chaotic.

If the human being is nature in terms of any law that occurs in the wild ubønhørlig also for the human being, so any process that acts in the human being must also exist in nature, because the human being is nature.

When this must also apply to any interaction, the human being enters into with other people, because this is the nature of that intragerer with the nature.

The notion of the dialectic relationship between chance and necessity, as it will take up in quantum physics, leads us back to the real notion of nature's freedom, about the mennsket freedom.

The future will be to by being partly determined by the past, but it is certainly not definitely predetermined. It is also not simple aspects of nature, or nature as a historical phylogenetic fremtredelsesform (man). This is neither in the individual development phase, single individual's opportunities to shape their lives and their body, or as arts development, humanity's development directions.

With this also follows that nature's ontogenetic fremtredelsesform (the individual's life history) is also the carrier of any opportunity that may act in real life.

Freedom from determinism is not given, it is created, and is won by changing the necessity. This can only happen by actions such as increasing the number of opportunities and by the fact that these actions varies the possible. Certain hendelsers level of opportunity can be enlarged, while others can be mitigated.

The human being is in its active business far from any throw the ball for the fanatical blind chance, or subject to an immutable necessity. The random in real events makes man the use of, and yet nekets freedom depends precisely on that man's future can be determined because it is not determined in advance.

Real life abides not unreservedly after what we think, but our thoughts must be brought in congruence with what really exist in nature. When our thoughts can melt together with and rise up in nature, so that nature melt together with nature.

Nature can step forward for us in different ways at different times and in different forms, but it will always be and remain forever nature, such a man will always be and always remain natural.

But if the human being is natural, as is any thought, the human being also produces natural, every show, every fantasy has to be natural. If every thought and every notion, too, is natural, so is the idea of God also nature. However, since the notion of God is the nature of God must also be natural. But if God is nature, such as the human being, yes then may God be man.

Man and God are one.

But when is the human being back with the gudommelige in its own right, in his flesh and blood, by their very nature. The gudommelige by the human being is the fact that it is natural. When the human being acknowledge that it is the nature, the human being achieves full freedom to live as nature, with nature and in nature. When the man is human.

Set out from this line of thinking so conquers the human being his full freedom only if there is at all levels fully and completely acknowledge that it is nature, and living in nature as nature.

 Specialist in clinical psychology (PHD) Kjell Standal